Search: 154 results

Exact Match

The males in the same way also left natural relations with females and were inflamed in their lust for one another. Males committed shameless acts with males and received in their own persons the appropriate penalty of their error.

Therefore, any one of you who judges is without excuse. For when you judge another, you condemn yourself, since you, the judge, do the same things.

but glory, honor, and peace for everyone who does what is good, first to the Jew, and also to the Greek.

and if you are convinced that you are a guide for the blind, a light to those in darkness,

For circumcision benefits you if you observe the law, but if you are a lawbreaker, your circumcision has become uncircumcision.

For a person is not a Jew who is one outwardly, and true circumcision is not something visible in the flesh.

What then? Are we any better? Not at all! For we have previously charged that both Jews and Gentiles are all under sin,

Or is God for Jews only? Is He not also for Gentiles? Yes, for Gentiles too,

For what does the Scripture say?

Abraham believed God,
and it was credited to him for righteousness.

But to the one who does not work, but believes on Him who declares the ungodly to be righteous, his faith is credited for righteousness.

Is this blessing only for the circumcised, then? Or is it also for the uncircumcised? For we say, Faith was credited to Abraham for righteousness.

For the promise to Abraham or to his descendants that he would inherit the world was not through the law, but through the righteousness that comes by faith.

Now it was credited to him was not written for Abraham alone,

but also for us. It will be credited to us who believe in Him who raised Jesus our Lord from the dead.

So then, as through one trespass there is condemnation for everyone, so also through one righteous act there is life-giving justification for everyone.

For in light of the fact that He died, He died to sin once for all; but in light of the fact that He lives, He lives to God.

I am using a human analogy because of the weakness of your flesh. For just as you offered the parts of yourselves as slaves to moral impurity, and to greater and greater lawlessness, so now offer them as slaves to righteousness, which results in sanctification.

For when you were slaves of sin, you were free from allegiance to righteousness.

So what fruit was produced then from the things you are now ashamed of? For the end of those things is death.

So then, if she gives herself to another man while her husband is living, she will be called an adulteress. But if her husband dies, she is free from that law. Then, if she gives herself to another man, she is not an adulteress.

What should we say then? Is the law sin? Absolutely not! On the contrary, I would not have known sin if it were not for the law. For example, I would not have known what it is to covet if the law had not said, Do not covet.

And sin, seizing an opportunity through the commandment, produced in me coveting of every kind. For apart from the law sin is dead.

and I died. The commandment that was meant for life resulted in death for me.

For sin, seizing an opportunity through the commandment, deceived me, and through it killed me.

For the creation was subjected to futility—not willingly, but because of Him who subjected it—in the hope

And He who searches the hearts knows the Spirit’s mind-set, because He intercedes for the saints according to the will of God.

For I am persuaded that not even death or life,
angels or rulers,
things present or things to come, hostile powers,

But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For not all who are descended from Israel are Israel.

For this is the statement of the promise: At this time I will come, and Sarah will have a son.

For though her sons had not been born yet or done anything good or bad, so that God’s purpose according to election might stand—

For He tells Moses:

I will show mercy
to whom I will show mercy,
and I will have compassion
on whom I will have compassion.

You will say to me, therefore, “Why then does He still find fault? For who can resist His will?”

Or has the potter no right over the clay, to make from the same lump one piece of pottery for honor and another for dishonor?

And what if He did this to make known the riches of His glory on objects of mercy that He prepared beforehand for glory